There's also a physical button below to wake up the screen which makes it nicer to get to sub-menus on the tracker.įlipping over to the Charge 5, you're getting something that's still pretty svelte with a sleek aluminum case that comes in three color options. The Vivosmart 5 features a monochrome OLED touchscreen display, which is nicely responsive and offers good visibility indoors and in bright outdoor light. The watch-style buckle means it doesn't budge either. It's undeniably the sportier-looking of the two, but it's light, comfortable to wear day and night, and didn't cause any irritations to wear. Garmin's tracker is slimmer, with a silicone strap that can be removed and replaced with another one of Garmin's official straps to mix up that look. We'd say the Charge 5 is the nicer of the bands, but there are reasons you might opt for the Vivosmart 5 instead. If you're big into looks, then these trackers do offer distinctly different designs. You pay around the same amount for the two if you're in the US, but the Charge 5 can appear pricier than the Vivosmart 5 in other territories including the UK. Let's talk about how much these trackers cost before we get deeper into those comparisons. If you want a fitness tracker and are looking at the Charge 5 and the Vivosmart 5 as options, here's how the two match up. We've spent plenty of testing time with both to help you get a good sense of how these bands compare and where the biggest wins and losses lie.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |